Four fights, handled.
Retained as a party’s expert or appointed as the court’s neutral, the work is the same: establish what the technology actually did, and put it in terms a judge can act on.
eDiscovery Special Master
Court-appointed neutral for ESI disputes — protocols, privilege, TAR, and spoliation resolved without consuming the court's motion calendar.
Read more→Spoliation & Sanctions Analysis
Independent Rule 37(e) analysis — duty, loss, restorability, prejudice, and intent, each established on the technical record rather than argued by inference.
Read more→TAR & Predictive Coding Validation
Sampling design, recall and elusion estimates, and the statistical record that makes a technology-assisted review defensible under challenge.
Read more→ESI Protocols & Rule 26(f)
Sources, custodians, search methodology, and production format settled in the protocol — where the decisions cost nothing, rather than in motion practice, where they cost everything.
Read more→Engagements outside these four — collection defensibility, review-process audits, expert reports and testimony — are described on the capabilities overview. If the issue in your matter is not listed, it is still worth a call.